Research and Exploration

Core-shell Structured RuO2@IrO2 for Oxygen Evolution Reaction in Acid Electrochemical Water Electrolyst


LIANG Fengbo, XIONG Hongxu, CHEN Zihao, GONG Qiqi, SUN Liangliang, LIU Lili

(Jingdezhen Ceramic University, Jingdezhen 333403, Jiangxi, China)

Extended Abstract:[Background and purpose] Hydrogen energy is regarded as an ideal energy carrier due to its high energy density and large combustion calorific value. Recently, the utilization of green hydrogen has become a hot topic of social concern as it can effectively achieve the sustainable developments known as "carbon neutrality". Among various energy conversion and transforming technologies, proton exchange membrane (PEM) water electrolysis for hydrogen production has several advantages, such as abundant raw materials, high hydrogen production facile operation and so on. Considering reforming reaction of fossil fuels with low output and harsh carbon emissions, water electrolysis via PEM technology meets sustainable goals for the production of green hydrogen. Unfortunately, the slow oxygen evolution reaction (OER) in the PEM electrolyze is the bottleneck of water electrolysis for hydrogen production. OER kinetics rate is of great significance to develop efficient and stable electrocatalysts.[Methods] Ruthenium dioxide, as one of the noble metal oxides, which is insoluble in water and acid, is widely used in chemical catalysts, capacitors and ruthenium resistance paste. In the OER reaction, the lower equilibrium potentials of Ir3+/Ir4+ and Ru3+/Ru4+ (0.93, 0.94 V) make them suitable for commercial oxygen evolution catalysts. The order of OER activity in acidic conditions is Ir~Ru>Pd>Rh>Pt>Au>Nb>Zr~Ti~Ta. RuO2 and IrO2 with excellent activity are also different. Specifically, RuO2 has higher catalytic activity and is cheaper than IrO2, but IrO2 is more stable than RuO2. It should be pointed out that the main reason for the low stability of Ru materials is the deactivation of RuO2 in the acid reaction. In addition, high applied potential during operation leads to the conversion of RuO2 into soluble RuO4. Although high potential and high current density can increase the oxygen evolution, the accelerated dissolution of RuO2 cannot be ignored. It is believed that this dissolution reaction occurs at voltages of above 1.3 V. Considering the theoretical oxygen evolution potential (1.23 V), the key problems are mainly that RuO2 catalysts are effectively protected against dissolution reaction with the lowered catalytic overpotential. Recently, the single atom Ru-N-C catalyst and the Co single atom have been reported to be inserted into RuO2 spheres, which showed excellent oxygen evolution catalytic performance and long-term stability. The result exhibited the potential of RuO2 materials as oxygen evolution catalysts. To obtain a catalyst with high activity and stability, RuO2@ IrO2 composite catalyst was developed for efficient and fast water electrolysis in acid PEMFC. IrO2 (5–10 nm) is deposited on the surface of nano RuO2 by using the Adams melting method, while the morphology and catalytic performance of the catalyst were optimized by adjusting the ratio of the two components (8:2, 6:4, 5:5).[Results] Crystal structure, elemental composition and surface morphology of the materials were characterized by using X-ray diffraction (XRD), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and electrochemical workstation. Compared with RuO2 and IrO2, the order of OER activity at 10 mA·cm−2 is: RuO2> RuO2@IrO2-1> RuO2@IrO2-2> RuO2@IrO2-3> IrO2. However, RuO2@IrO2-1 and RuO2@IrO2-2 outperform RuO2 at 1.5 V, showing excellent catalytic performance at high current densities. The measured currents of the membrane electrodes prepared with the corresponding powders are 1.17 A and 1.25 A at 2.2 V. A small content of IrO2 (20 wt.%) can optimize the transition oxidation solution of RuO2 during oxygen evolution. In stability test, RuOhas a potential attenuation of 54 mV under continuous 20 h testing, the value of RuO2@IrO2-1 is reduced to 29 mV. When the content of IrO2 was further increased to 50 wt.%, the coating structure will be destroyed and excessive exposure to RuO2 will accelerate the catalyst deactivation. A sea urchin-structured RuO2@ IrO2 catalyst was prepared by using this method. The loading of an appropriate content of IrO2 can alleviate the excessive oxidation and dissolution of RuO2 during the OER process, providing strong protection for RuO2 and thereby enhancing the stability of the catalyst.[Conclusions] In summary, RuO2 as IrO2 carrier is in line with the low technology of PEM water electrolysis development direction of cost, high efficiency and long life. Especially after improving the preparation process and the content of precious metals, the material has excellent oxygen evolution performance and high stability, showing potential applications and long-term development in the field of PEM electrolysis cells.

Key words: PEMFC; oxygen evolution reaction; iridium/ruthenium oxide; catalytic activity


  • View full text】Downloadedtimes

Print    Favorites      export BibTex      export EndNote      export XML